Whether we’re talking about resolutions of initiating new behaviors like working out or extinguishing old behaviors like food indulgences, there is a curious “third self” whose job is to think of clever ways to resolve conflicts between the first and second selves.
The third self employs all kinds of logic, rewards, and punishments to get compliance of the second self to the first self’s supposed “good” intentions.
I would think that the whole matter requires a fourth (higher) self who looks at the whole drama and says, my only intention is to be unapologetically who I am. It is the resolution to favor authenticity over manipulation.
—Jack/Zen
This morning I realized that I’ve owned my copy of The Artist’s Way for nine years. Nine years. Where did they go? Anyhow, I’ve made two attempts at following the book, and each time my efforts petered out just after the first chapter. On January 1, a group of bloggers loosely joined will embark on this journey, and I am among them. (Anyone is welcome to join in, too!)
I’ve skimmed the other chapters and was intrigued by the tasks assigned in each. As I pondered why I never progressed further than chapter one, the answer emerged: I loath the morning pages, where each morning one is supposed to handwrite three pages in stream-of-conscious style. I rarely write longhand anymore; when I do, it is uncomfortable for me. I am also not a morning person, and getting up early for my new job will be enough of a feat. Furthermore, there is in me a rebellious streak. When something is conveyed as non-negotiable, as Julia Cameron’s “morning pages rule” is, I resist. I think, “Excuse me? I am voluntarily doing this. I paid for the book. Do not position anything as mandatory to me.” My failed attempts at traveling the Artist’s Way were rooted in this response. My “artist self” was overcome by my “lazy/rebellious/critical/fill-in-the-blank-with-a-negative self” and gave up.
So now I must ask myself if I resolve to do it the author’s way in this third attempt and risk getting bogged down in morning page resistance again. I used to think that my failure to complete the work was because I felt lonely and wanted to do it with other people, but I know myself better than I did in 1997 or 2002. Certainly I will enjoy the journey with other people, but the barrier to my success is this resistance to the rule of morning pages.
Julia Cameron would probably call me “blocked” and insist this is exactly why I should write the morning pages. My response to this is to listen to my own wisdom. She may be a guide to creativity, but she is not the Final Authority on Creative Truth. I am willing to participate and make serious effort to explore my creativity. If one autocratic rule will hinder this, then I will dispense with it. Why rob myself of other worthwhile exploration (the spirit of the law) for one rule (the letter of the law)? Her book is a guide, not an artist’s catechism.
So I hereby declare power over my own creative process and dare to fashion it to my needs. I am not split into “selves” that are pitted against each other. I have faith in self-knowledge; I rely on my wisdom that says there is more to be gained by making an exception to her rule than in being leashed to it. I resolve, as Jack wrote, “to favor authenticity over manipulation” and unapologetically be myself. And who knows? Perhaps by freeing myself of the illusion that I must do as the author says, I will find myself genuinely writing morning pages. Or not.